Free Essays on Theology

I’m not sure which one is right but in my opinion I would say that God permits evil instead of willing it. If you say God wills evil then it seems he wants to cause evil and hurt, whereas permitting evil is used as an experience to learn from or a plan from God. I don’t think evil is simply random, chaotic or gratuitous. I believe sometimes there’s a purpose to evil. God can use it to make us realize something, draw us near to him in difficult times. For example, in the recent WTC tragedy, many lives were taken and evil struck America particularly Washington D.C and New York. But after all this took place, there was an over pouring of love and unity among Americans like never before. Everyone was helping and donating for the cause, praying and attending ceremonies. This tragedy brought a lot of people together. Another example is the death of Jesus Christ. Though it was sad Jesus had to be crucified, his death is the key aspect to salvation and Christian ity. Christ redeems us from sin meaning we are sinners and only Jesus can forgive our sins and through him we receive salvation. We don’t realize what we have until it’s gone. We at times take things for granted and it gets taken away from us for a reason. Sometimes evil happenings are a wake up call or turning point in ones life. I have been through hardships whether it being a family member being ill, car accidents, and losing a friend. It gives you a perspective on life and makes you value what’s really important in life. You have to appreciate and live life not taking things for granted. We ask why does God allow evil in the world and we have no answer but I feel things happen for a reason and God will only know why.... Free Essays on Theology Free Essays on Theology I’m not sure which one is right but in my opinion I would say that God permits evil instead of willing it. If you say God wills evil then it seems he wants to cause evil and hurt, whereas permitting evil is used as an experience to learn from or a plan from God. I don’t think evil is simply random, chaotic or gratuitous. I believe sometimes there’s a purpose to evil. God can use it to make us realize something, draw us near to him in difficult times. For example, in the recent WTC tragedy, many lives were taken and evil struck America particularly Washington D.C and New York. But after all this took place, there was an over pouring of love and unity among Americans like never before. Everyone was helping and donating for the cause, praying and attending ceremonies. This tragedy brought a lot of people together. Another example is the death of Jesus Christ. Though it was sad Jesus had to be crucified, his death is the key aspect to salvation and Christian ity. Christ redeems us from sin meaning we are sinners and only Jesus can forgive our sins and through him we receive salvation. We don’t realize what we have until it’s gone. We at times take things for granted and it gets taken away from us for a reason. Sometimes evil happenings are a wake up call or turning point in ones life. I have been through hardships whether it being a family member being ill, car accidents, and losing a friend. It gives you a perspective on life and makes you value what’s really important in life. You have to appreciate and live life not taking things for granted. We ask why does God allow evil in the world and we have no answer but I feel things happen for a reason and God will only know why.... Free Essays on Theology I’m not sure which one is right but in my opinion I would say that God permits evil instead of willing it. If you say God wills evil then it seems he wants to cause evil and hurt, whereas permitting evil is used as an experience to learn from or a plan from God. I don’t think evil is simply random, chaotic or gratuitous. I believe sometimes there’s a purpose to evil. God can use it to make us realize something, draw us near to him in difficult times. For example, in the recent WTC tragedy, many lives were taken and evil struck America particularly Washington D.C and New York. But after all this took place, there was an over pouring of love and unity among Americans like never before. Everyone was helping and donating for the cause, praying and attending ceremonies. This tragedy brought a lot of people together. Another example is the death of Jesus Christ. Though it was sad Jesus had to be crucified, his death is the key aspect to salvation and Christian ity. Christ redeems us from sin meaning we are sinners and only Jesus can forgive our sins and through him we receive salvation. We don’t realize what we have until it’s gone. We at times take things for granted and it gets taken away from us for a reason. Sometimes evil happenings are a wake up call or turning point in ones life. I have been through hardships whether it being a family member being ill, car accidents, and losing a friend. It gives you a perspective on life and makes you value what’s really important in life. You have to appreciate and live life not taking things for granted. We ask why does God allow evil in the world and we have no answer but I feel things happen for a reason and God will only know why....

asasas essays

asasas essays The Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, better known as aids is the most deadly disease known to man today. There are approximately 20 million people living with aids in the world and the number is growing. The epidemic is sweeping through the continents of Africa and Southeast Asia. There is currently no vaccine or cure for aids. The Human Immunodeficiency Virus is the virus that causes aids. HIV is a virus that attacks the cells in your body that are supposed to prevent you from illnesses. CD4 or T-helper is white blood cells in the body that fight off bacteria, viruses, and certain types of cancer. Since CD4 cells fight off viruses and infections from your body, when your CD4 count becomes low you are prone to infections and cancers of the body. Diseases like Dysplasia can lead to cervical cancer in HIV+ females which is life threatening. Other illnesses include PCP, pneumonia. You are diagnosed with aids once you CD4 count are 200 or less. Basketball Legend, Magic Johnson has kept his CD4 count above 200. This is why he has not developed aids since being diagnosed with HIV twelve years ago. HIV can be transmitted through various forms of bodily fluid contact. The most common way HIV is transmitted is unprotected vaginal or anal intercourse. Oral Sex on the genitals with no barrier is way to transmit the virus. Sharing drug injection needles is way to transmit the virus. You can contract the virus by being injected with a needle with contaminated blood or unscreened blood transfusions. It can be passed from a mother to her baby is she is HIV+. Aids can not be transmitted through casual contact. There are actually two types of HIV known in the world. HIV-1 and HIV-2 both transmit through sexual contact but HIV- 2 is less easily transmitted. People often refer to HIV-1 when talking about HIV. The subtypes in HIV are separated into two groups. Group M and O contain different HIV strains. Ten subtypes belong to group M, cla...

The Cholula Massacre by Cortes

The Cholula Massacre by Cortes The Cholula massacre was one of the most ruthless actions of conquistador Hernan Cortes in his drive to conquer Mexico. Learn about this historic event. In October of 1519, Spanish conquistadors led by Hernan Cortes assembled the nobles of the Aztec city of Cholula in one of the city courtyards, where Cortes accused them of treachery. Moments later, Cortes ordered his men to attack the mostly unarmed crowd. Outside of town, Cortes Tlaxcalan allies also attacked, as the Cholulans were their traditional enemies. Within hours, thousands of inhabitants of Cholula, including most of the local nobility, were dead in the streets. The Cholula massacre sent a powerful statement to the rest of Mexico, especially the mighty Aztec state and their indecisive leader, Montezuma II. The City of Cholula In 1519, Cholula was one of the most important cities in the Aztec Empire. Located not far from the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan, it was clearly within the sphere of Aztec influence. Cholula was home to an estimated 100,000 people and was known for a bustling market and for producing excellent trade goods, including pottery. It was best known as a religious center, however. It was home to the magnificent Temple of Tlaloc, which was the largest pyramid ever built by ancient cultures, bigger even than the ones in Egypt. It was best known, however, as the center of the Cult of Quetzalcoatl. This god had been around in some form since the ancient Olmec civilization, and worship of Quetzalcoatl had peaked during the mighty Toltec civilization, which dominated central Mexico from 900–1150 or so. The Temple of Quetzalcoatl at Cholula was the center of worship for this deity. The Spanish and Tlaxcala The Spanish conquistadors, under ruthless leader Hernan Cortes, had landed near present-day Veracruz in April of 1519. They had proceeded to make their way inland, making alliances with local tribes or defeating them as the situation warranted. As the brutal adventurers made their way inland, Aztec Emperor Montezuma II tried to threaten them or buy them off, but any gifts of gold only increased the Spaniards insatiable thirst for wealth. In September of 1519, the Spanish arrived in the free state of Tlaxcala. The Tlaxcalans had resisted the Aztec Empire for decades and were one of only a handful of places in central Mexico not under Aztec rule. The Tlaxcalans attacked the Spanish but were repeatedly defeated. They then welcomed the Spanish, establishing an alliance they hoped would overthrow their hated adversaries, the Mexica (Aztecs). The Road to Cholula The Spanish rested at Tlaxcala with their new allies and Cortes pondered his next move. The most direct road to Tenochtitlan went through Cholula and emissaries sent by Montezuma urged the Spanish to go through there, but Cortes new Tlaxcalan allies repeatedly warned the Spanish leader that the Cholulans were treacherous and that Montezuma would ambush them somewhere near the city. While still in Tlaxcala, Cortes exchanged messages with the leadership of Cholula, who at first sent some low-level negotiators who were rebuffed by Cortes. They later sent some more important noblemen to confer with the conquistador. After consulting with the Cholulans and his captains, Cortes decided to go through Cholula. Reception in Cholula The Spanish left Tlaxcala on October 12 and arrived in Cholula two days later. The intruders were awed by the magnificent city, with its towering temples, well laid-out streets and bustling market. The Spanish got a lukewarm reception. They were allowed to enter the city (although their escort of fierce Tlaxcalan warriors was forced to remain outside), but after the first two or three days, the locals stopped bringing them any food. Meanwhile, city leaders were reluctant to meet with Cortes. Before long, Cortes began to hear of rumors of treachery. Although the Tlaxcalans were not allowed in the city, he was accompanied by s ome Totonacs from the coast, who were allowed to roam freely. They told him of preparations for war in Cholula: pits dug in the streets and camouflaged, women and children fleeing the area, and more. In addition, two local minor noblemen informed Cortes of a plot to ambush the Spanish once they left the city. Malinche's Report The most damning report of treachery came through Cortes mistress and interpreter, Malinche. Malinche had struck up a friendship with a local woman, the wife of a high-ranking Cholulan soldier. One night, the woman came to see Malinche and told her that she should flee immediately because of the impending attack. The woman suggested that Malinche could marry her son after the Spanish were gone. Malinche agreed to go with her in order to buy time and then turned the old woman over to Cortes. After interrogating her, Cortes was certain of a plot. Cortes' Speech On the morning that the Spanish were supposed to leave (the date is uncertain, but was in late October 1519), Cortes summoned the local leadership to the courtyard in front of the Temple of Quetzalcoatl, using the pretext that he wished to say goodbye to them before he left. With the Cholula leadership assembled, Cortes began to speak, his words translated by Malinche. Bernal Diaz del Castillo, one of Cortes foot soldiers, was in the crowd and recalled the speech many years later: He (Cortes) said: How anxious these traitors are to see us among the ravines so that they can gorge themselves on our flesh. But our lord will prevent it....Cortes then asked the Caciques why they had turned traitors and decided the night before that they would kill us, seeing that we had done them nor harm but had merely warned them against...wickedness and human sacrifice, and the worship of idols...Their hostility was plain to see, and their treachery also, which they could not conceal...He was well aware, he said, that they had many companies of warriors lying in wait for us in some ravines nearby ready to carry out the treacherous attack they had planned... (Diaz del Castillo, 198-199) The Cholula Massacre According the Diaz, the assembled nobles did not deny the accusations  but claimed that they were merely following the wishes of Emperor Montezuma. Cortes responded that the King of Spains laws decreed that treachery must not go unpunished. With that, a musket shot fired: this was the signal the Spanish were waiting for. The heavily armed and armored conquistadors attacked the assembled crowd, mostly unarmed noblemen, priests and other city leaders, firing arquebuses and crossbows and hacking with steel swords. The shocked populace of Cholula trampled one another in their vain efforts to escape. Meanwhile, the Tlaxcalans, traditional enemies of Cholula, rushed into the city from their camp outside of town to attack and pillage. Within a couple of hours, thousands of Cholulans lay dead in the streets. Aftermath of the Cholula Massacre Still incensed, Cortes allowed his savage Tlaxcalan allies to sack the city and haul victims back to Tlaxcala as slaves and sacrifices. The city was in ruins and the temple burned for two days. After a few days, a few surviving Cholulan noblemen returned, and Cortes bade them tell the people that it was safe to come back. Cortes had two messengers from Montezuma with him, and they witnessed the massacre. He sent them back to Montezuma with the message that the lords of Cholula had implicated Montezuma in the attack and that he would be marching on Tenochtitlan as a conqueror. The messengers soon returned with word from Montezuma disavowing any involvement in the attack, which he blamed solely on the Cholulans and some local Aztec leaders. Cholula itself was sacked, providing much gold for the greedy Spanish. They also found some stout wooden cages with prisoners inside who were being fattened up for sacrifice: Cortes ordered them freed. Cholulan leaders who had told Cortes about the plot were rewarded. The Cholula Massacre sent a clear message to Central Mexico: the Spanish were not to be trifled with. It also proved to Aztec vassal states- of which many were unhappy with the arrangement- that the Aztecs could not necessarily protect them. Cortes hand-picked successors to rule Cholula while he was there, thus ensuring that his supply line to the port of Veracruz, which now ran through Cholula and Tlaxcala, would not be endangered. When Cortes finally did leave Cholula in November of 1519, he reached Tenochtitlan without being ambushed. This raises the question of whether or not there had been a treacherous plan in the first place. Some historians question whether Malinche, who translated everything the Cholulans said and who conveniently provided the most damning evidence of a plot, orchestrated it herself. The historical sources seem to agree, however, that there was an abundance of evidence to support the likelihood of a plot. References Castillo, Bernal DiÃŒ az del, Cohen J. M., and Radice B.  The Conquest of New Spain. London: Clays Ltd./Penguin; 1963. Levy, Buddy.  Conquistador: Hernan Cortes, King  Montezuma, and the Last Stand of the Aztecs.  New York: Bantam, 2008. Thomas, Hugh.  The Real Discovery of America: Mexico November 8, 1519. New York: Touchstone, 1993.

Lead Presentation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Lead Presentation - Essay Example In the present report, we will concentrate upon different approaches to calculating payment to the staff, with especial emphasis upon the use of performance-based and skill-based payment systems, and compensation packages. Whereas there are several types of salary (fixed, performance-based, skill-based, etc.), each having its merits and demerits, the companies choose the one that corresponds ideally to the profession, style of work, and even personal traits of workers. It is a well-known phenomenon that whereas some categories of employees are motivated by high salaries, others prefer getting compensation package rather than big salary. For companies' managers, it is often difficult to choose between offering their employees high salary, on the one hand, and other benefits on the other. Let us therefore consider two types of payment and compensation packages, and how their use influences the performance of the employees. Skill-based system of employees' remuneration certainly has both advantages and disadvantages: on the one hand, it makes the task of calculating the payment for each worker easier for the company's management and allows to attract and retain highly skilled personnel, but on the other hand it takes into account skills rather than actual performance and therefore people get more not because they work hard but because of their background. Sometimes employees with better skills perform worse than those who are less skilled, and in these cases such a system of payment will affect the quality of work, lower employees' motivation, and even destroy team spirit. Yet, it may be argued that those who had been able to develop a certain amount of skills are those whose motivation and performance are high, and the system of skill-based payment works under the condition that certain rules are stuck to. First of all, it is crucial that the employees understand the way the payment is calculated, and fully committed to the company so that there are no doubts as for its fair attitude to staff. (Schuster, 1998) Secondly, the company's management has to make sure that the skills the workers acquire correspond to the company's goals, since it has been pinpointed that skill-based pay is likely to cause problems in cases when the skills acquired by the staff 'become outdated or if the skills are not being used to the fullest by the company'. (Ashish et al. 2004) Therefore, the company should "reflect the button of an employees learned skills to the achievement of company goals". (Fox 2002) 2.2. Compensation packages Perhaps the main argument in favor of company's using compensation packages is that this brings the employees to a considerable degree of commitment making them regard their company as stable, reliable, and caring about its staff's wellbeing. Nowadays, practically any respectable company offers their staff compensation packages of some sort which may include bonuses, holding companies' stocks, getting discounts, medical insurance, etc. (What does a total compensation package include, 2001; Compensation package, 2005; Evaluating the total compensation package, 2005) Free trainings and courses are also extremely motivating, especially for the young

Chapter 1-3 questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Chapter 1-3 questions - Assignment Example Historians show that immediately after the end of the threat to England, the English nationalists obtained freedom and began growing and enforcing their roots. Accordingly, a section of the Englishmen who liked the queen threw their support for the Church of England but hated Catholics, majority of whom were from Spain. However, later attempts to stop the expansion of the English only served to promote the establishment of the English culture and pride (Brands et al., 2012). The Puritans decided to leave England and migrate to North America because they wanted to settle in a place where they could be free to practice their religion without interference. This is because they were strongly opposed to the liturgy and rituals of the Catholicism that was being imposed on them by the Church of England (Brands et al., 2012). The chaos that was experienced during the New Jersey settlement occurred due to two main factors. Firstly, the chaos emerged due to rivalry between Swedes and the Dutch over the fur trade. Secondly, the chaos erupted during the settlement following the New York governors move to assign lands to many Puritan groups unaware of the existence of Carteret and Berkeley proprietorship (Brands et al., 2012). The Barbadians background as agriculturalists contributed significantly to the development of the Carolinas. The Barbadians introduced the concept of sugarcane plantation to the Carolinas, which not only employed many of the residents, but also acted as a source of livelihood for the Carolinas (Brands et al., 2012). Life for women in the 17th century New England was difficult are required perseverance. Historians show that women of the time lived in deplorable conditions characterized by poor diet, illnesses and that childbearing was constant as women were expected only to bear children., Women of the time were also had to do hard work all day long. At the same time, women of the time had no right to choose a husband for themselves.

Theory Critique Feminist and Post Modern Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Theory Critique Feminist and Post Modern - Essay Example Thus, Feminist therapy aims to empower women to push their own strengths to the fullest in order to gain the self-respect they need, regardless of what society dictates of them. Society has originally painted the ideal picture of women to be the nurturing, caring, weaker gender, dependent on the strengths and skills of men, and relegated to homemaking tasks. However, changing times have pressured them to be independent, self-reliant and strong members of the workforce. Such double standards have caused confusion and stress in women, adding more burden to her already heavy load. To quote from the textbook, the five goals for feminist therapy are: â€Å"equality, balancing independence and interdependence, empowerment, self-nurturance and valuing diversity. But the ultimate goal of feminist therapy is to create the kind of society where sexism and other forms of discrimination and oppression are no longer a reality.† This kind of therapy hopes to transform society by changing the way women view themselves. The feminist therapist, aware of women’s issues, must be sensitive enough to handle delicate concerns of the client. She (or he) must be willing to disclose her own experiences and use these as springboard to gain the client’s trust and to model empowered behavior. She must be clear about her own values, but discerning enough not to impose these on the client. She should know how to balance exploring both the inner and outer worlds of the client if the client is to find a way to take action in her own life. The therapist has enough influence on the client as to choosing the direction the client wants to take in her life. Ultimately, the therapist helps in guiding the client to be clear about her own needs and wants and to pursue it without being too conscious of what society has to say. Sometimes, though, the therapist may tread dangerous ground if the culture and value system of the client comes into the picture. If a woman

Reflecting on Assessment Personal Statement Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Reflecting on Assessment - Personal Statement Example I know that whenever we are trying to accomplish something, it is a group effort so you cannot have the results exactly as you had in mind because individual perceptions differ but on the whole it was still close to what I had wanted so I feel happy. Conflicts were common and most of the time, they were handled pretty well though it all depended on the individuals involved in the conflicts. Some of them were quite mature so they handled their issues with utmost sensitivity while others were a bit callous. But since in the end it was important to have them resolved, we refused to talk too much about them. Though it would have been better if we could discuss the way in which some of us handled conflicts. That way we can do better in future and understand our own limitations in much better way. Individual contribution was encouraged but some times some of us felt underappreciated. Though I feel that the contributions I made were acknowledged, I still feel that some of the members were acknowledged more than others. I am just not sure they really deserved it.